Recently, the case of Saltmer v Rennick Lawyers Pty Ltd  QSC 307 was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland in Townsville where the Court was called upon to question of costs in a situation where a deceased person's family member requested a copy of a document held by a Solicitor that the family … Continue reading Catch and Release: Court considers when s33Z applies to a ‘purported’ Will (Qld)
It is a suggestion that arises throughout many estate disputes that the claim of a widow on an estate should be paramount to those of other family member who survive the deceased person. However, as each case is determined on it's merits, this is not always the case. Yesterday, the Supreme Court of New South Wales … Continue reading Wife support: FPA by widow dismissed with costs (NSW)
Many people would have a different view of exactly what a "close personal relationship" may look like. In New South Wales Family Provision law, their collection of people who may make a claim on an estate further further provision is much wider than that of Queensland. Under section 57(1)(f) of the Succession Act 2006 (NSW), … Continue reading Dare to Care: Close personal relationship in FPA (NSW)
Recently, the NSW Supreme Court determined a slightly unusual coupling of issues; a construction matter as to a right to reside conditional upon payment of expenses alongside a family provision claim over 15 years out of time. The recent case of Estate of George Roby, deceased  NSWSC 265 involved the estate of the late George Roby who passed … Continue reading Escaping the Nest: Abandoning a right to reside and FPA 15 years out of time
“There is no one alive who is you-er than you!” – Dr Seuss In an odd case, Chief Justice Catherine Holmes was called upon to determine an application of probate in solemn form with a side order of an imposter claim. In the case Martin Terrence Farrell v Warren Elbridge Boston  QSC 278, the Applicant, Martin … Continue reading “There is no one alive who is you-er than you!” – Imposter Testator and the Supreme Court
This month, the Supreme Court of New South Wales, determined a family provision claim by a self-sufficient adult daughter and an adult grandson. In the case of Re Filomena Rodi, deceased  NSWSC 1696, the deceased was survived by four children, 2 daughters and 2 sons, and had left her estate to them equally. … Continue reading FPA x2: Grandson vs Daughter – Close Personal Relationship
Recently, the Supreme Court of New South Wales was tasked with determining whether the Court should dismiss or discontinue proceedings following the plaintiff's parentage testing resulting in him not being the deceased's child and therefore not an eligible person to make a claim. In the matter of Patterson v Scott  NSWSC 1477 the Court heard that the plaintiff had commenced a family provision … Continue reading An offer is an offer, no matter how small?: Costs in FPA after parentage test negative. Dismiss/Discontinue?